KOCHI: The ED told the high court that Swapna has given her statement that SivaSankar's name was not mentioned at first out of fear and that he was a highly influential person.

The ED's explanation came amid the ongoing response argument of Sivasankar, who was arrested under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Jaideep Gupta, a senior advocate in the Supreme Court, who appeared for Sivasankar, argued that Swapna was making such a statement under intense pressure. Following the conclusion of the arguments on the petition, the single bench adjourned to pronounce judgment.

Shivashankar is not cooperating

The ED argued that granting bail to Sivashankar would destroy evidence and influence witnesses. The agency said that he is not cooperating with the investigation. The money seized from Swapna's locker was a bribe received by Sivasankar. Even if it is argued that the money does not belong to Siva, it is a crime to help hide it. The case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act remains a prima facie case. The commission received was Rs 1.80 crore. The crucial statements of Swapna were taken on December 15,16, Sarith on December 17 and Sivasankar on December 18.

The absence of Sivasankar's name in the first charge sheet does not mean that he was not involved in the crime. Customs was called three or four times. He was talking to Swapna on WhatsApp and Telegram. Sivasankar knew about smuggling and provided assistance.