SignIn
Kerala Kaumudi Online
Tuesday, 23 June 2026 1.38 AM IST

Going coconuts! Man blows one lakh over ridiculous coconut tree dispute

Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Print Page
READ MALAYALAM VERSION
coconut-tree

KOCHI: In what might be the most expensive case of botanical anxiety in history, the Kerala High Court was forced to step in and play therapist, priest, and arborist to two squabbling suburbanites fighting over—yes, you guessed it—a single coconut tree.

Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, clearly exhausted by the sheer pettiness of the ordeal, ended up dropping some holy wisdom on the feuding duo. Dismissing the petition, the judge quoted the biblical commandment: "Love your neighbour as yourself." He pointed out the obvious reality that when real trouble hits, it’s your neighbour who rushes over to help, not a team of high-priced lawyers.

The drama kicked off in Nedumangad when a local resident convinced himself that his neighbour’s coconut tree was a ticking time bomb aimed directly at his rooftop. The accused neighbour, desperately trying to keep the peace, actually went out of his way to secure the tree with heavy-duty steel cables and draped a massive safety net over its crown to catch stray coconuts.

Standard safety measures? Sure. But it wasn't enough for our paranoid petitioner.

Fueled by pure spite and apparently very deep pockets, the man dragged the case all the way to the High Court. He was so desperate to win the backyard brawl that he willingly shelled out a whopping ₹1 lakh just to fund an official, court-appointed Advocate Commission to personally travel down and inspect the tree.

The commission’s highly anticipated, six-figure verdict? The tree is perfectly healthy. It is structurally rock-solid. The net works. The coconuts are going nowhere.

That is when Justice Kunhikrishnan delivered an absolute roast from the bench. In his final order, the judge remarked that if the coconut tree had a sense of humour, it would have laughed itself silly looking at the two grown men fighting underneath it. He added that if the tree had the conscious ability to self-destruct, it probably would have chopped itself down ages ago just to escape the daily drama.

While the court noted that the petitioner richly deserved a hefty fine for wasting precious judicial hours on a backyard squabble, the judge decided to take the high road. The court stated it wouldn't stoop to the bitter, uncompromising levels shown by the litigants.

The case was officially tossed out, leaving the petitioner a lakh poorer, the neighbour vindicated, and one very famous coconut tree still standing tall. The lesson here? Next time you have a problem with the guy next door, try buying him a cup of tea instead of hiring a legal army.

RELATED TOPICS: COCONUT, COCONUT FARM, COCONUT TREE, HIGHCOURT, DISPUTE, KERALA
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
KERALA KAUMUDI EPAPER
X
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet
consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
We respect your privacy. Your information is safe and will never be shared.